The Society of American Archivists
 
SAA Logo

Log in / Log out

Join SAA

Contact us


Society of
American Archivists

17 North State Street
Suite 1425
Chicago, IL 60602-3315
tel 312/606-0722
fax 312/606-0728
toll-free 866/722-7858

 

Announcements:


Continuing Professional Education Calendar


The Society: From Birth to Maturity

page 5

 

Introduction
SAA Membership
SAA Leadership (Council & Officers)
Research and Publication
Annual Meeting Analysis
Financial Profile
Presidential Perspective
SAA in a Comparative Context
End Notes




Annual Meeting Analysis

(Click on images to enlarge.)


Membership analysis provides a passive picture of the Society--a picture that features only those who paid dues. The leadership analysis reflects those elected to positions in the Society--officers, Council members, and Fellows. Such people are nominated and must be elected. Those who published in the American Archivist had to have their article approved by the editor and, usually, by additional outside referees. Between the total membership on the one hand, and its leadership on the other, there are a number of active professionals who attend meetings, present papers, and serve on committees. It is useful, therefore, to analyze the annual meetings to capture this middle level of participation. For the 1940 meeting in Montgomery, Alabama, that task is easy. There were sixty-nine registrants, of which nearly 70 percent were men. For the seven sessions, twenty-six of the twenty-nine session presenters or chairs were men--nearly 90 percent. Thus women were clearly underrepresented on the program, compared with their membership in the profession or their attendance at the meeting. Staff of the National Archives predictably dominated the program, followed by employees of colleges and universities. Among attendees, however, National Archives staff accounted for only 15 percent, trailing both state archives/libraries and colleges and universities.14

For 1965, the data is a bit murkier because the New York meeting was a joint meeting between SAA and the Association of Records Executives and Administrators (later ARMA). Nearly three hundred attendees were archivists, of whom a third were women. Of the sixty-four archival presenters and session chairs, about 85 percent were men. The largest number of session participants came from federal agencies, followed by colleges and universities, state archives, corporations, and historical societies. This pattern is nearly identical to the 1940 meeting.15

The fifty-fourth meeting of the Society in 1990 was held in Seattle with just over nine hundred registrants, 55 percent of whom were women. That year's program had 330 session participants in nearly 94 sessions. There, the breakdown reflected greater participation by men than women. College and university archivists outnumbered the next largest group of attendees--state and local archivists--by nearly a four-to-one ratio. Religious, corporate, and federal government archivists had just under 10 percent each. College and university archivists represented nearly a third of the session participants, the largest number by far.16

Throughout these fifty years, speakers and session content has reflected both the leadership of the Society and the issues of interest to contemporary archivists. Excluding the presidential address, there were only seven sessions at the 1940 meeting--none concurrent. Three of those sessions dealt with Southern themes, reflecting the location of the meeting, which was held in Montgomery, Alabama. Speakers included leaders of the first generation of American archivists such as Theodore Schellenberg, R. D. W. Connor, Theodore Pease, Ernst Posner, and Solon Buck. Prominent historians included Everett Edwards and Francis Simkins.17

The 1965 program contained fourteen archival sessions, twice the number as in 1940, plus eight sessions sponsored by the Association of Records Executives and Administrators. The three-day program included two to three concurrent sessions for each time slot. Sessions were dominated by the second generation of archival leaders and covered a range of topics: college and university archives (Herbert Finch, Philip Mason, and Robert Warner), state and local archives (Gerald Ham, H. G. Jones, and Charles Lee), religious archives (Augie Suelflow and Nelle Bellamy), records management (Frank Evans, William Rofes, and Everett Alldredge), manuscripts (Josephine Harper and Ruth Bordin), and historical records (Elizabeth Hamer, Philip Brooks, and Luther Evans).18

The Society's fifty-fourth annual meeting in 1990 ran for four-and-a-half days, including three days of concurrent sessions. The Society's size and diversity required a more complex organizational structure, including functional and employer-based sections, topical roundtables, committees, task forces, and ad hoc groups. Programs reflected a similar diversity in structure. While most sessions followed the traditional pattern of scholarly association meetings--one or two formal presentations, followed by a commentary--the Program accommodated a wider range of formats designed to meet increasingly diverse members' needs and interests, including:

  • work-in-progress presentations, offering speakers a forum for presenting tentative findings at a stage where audience feedback would be especially valuable.
  • limited-enrollment sessions, those involving extensive interaction among participants or the use of a demonstration which would be ineffective with a large audience.
  • special focus sessions designed to highlight innovative archival programs or new techniques for the profession.
  • pre-conference workshops coordinated by the Society's Education office.

Even more striking is the shift in program emphasis evident at the 1990 meeting, with over ninety sessions, averaging ten concurrent sessions for each program slot. While a few sessions focused on business, religious, or college and university archives or traditional functional areas such as acquisitions and reference, archivists were mainly concerned about issues that were either never or rarely discussed twenty-five years earlier. The largest number of sessions--nearly 15 percent--dealt with preservation, followed by electronic issues (either records or software to manage archival information), and documentation issues. Other areas with multiple sessions included legal/ethical issues, appraisal, education, and standards.19

 


<< previous page  next page >> 


Print this page


Plan now to attend SAA’s 72nd Annual Meeting
Early-Bird Registration Deadline: July 7

ARCHIVES 2008

Conference Schedule

The headquarters hotel is sold out. Click here for hotel information.


Pubs Catalog 2008

Browse SAA's 2008 Online Publications Catalog